The irony in Egypt’s political crisis

The irony in Egypt’s political crisis

  There is an abundance of irony in the current Egyptian situation. The
Muslim Brotherhood (MB) leadership is convinced that there are huge
forces within Egypt that wishes to wipe it out. Yet, with the actions of
the past couple of weeks, the MB has managed to increase the popularity
of such sentiment – and at the same time, alienate its best allies to
combat such sentiment.

When the revolution began on the 25th of January 2011,
almost two years ago, it was not the fall of then Egyptian president
Hosni Mubarak that was the greatest accomplishment. Frankly, at that
point, he had become irrelevant and almost inconsequential. A
revitalised Egyptian consciousness was born in Tahrir Square: one that
neither Mubarak nor any of his backers could understand at the time.
That consciousness still energises the supporters of the revolution
today.

If Egyptians expected the constitution to reflect that consciousness in
its totality, then that would have been naïve, if visionary. But it
seems that less than two years on, it’s assumed that spirit has all but
been extinguished. That’s a cynicism that misses, completely, why
Egyptians went to the streets over the past two weeks to protest
President Morsi’s decision.

It is easy to reduce this entire crisis to two clearly defined sides –
and certainly, it appears that much of the international media has
succumbed to that. The way in which this has been portrayed as a
democratically elected Islamist movement fighting against a secular
opposition crying over spilt milk, is all but total in different fora.
That narrative accepts untrue assumptions, and only serves to disrupt
any effort at understanding what is happening.

Nevertheless, the international media are not the only ones involved in
that kind of crass essentialism. Looking at different communication
from the Muslim Brotherhood’s spokespeople and official representatives,
as well as their supporters, one sees very clearly a worldview that is
very stark. It’s not just ‘us’ and ‘them’. It’s ‘us’ trying to survive
being extinguished by ‘them’. They remember well the years under the
previous regime where members of the MB were persecuted. After their
democratically won gains in elections over the past couple of years,
they have no intention of reverting back to that. In the midst of that,
the more strident the opposition as just being Mubarak stalwarts who
seek to throw the MB into cages. The most strident see them as wanting
to destroy Islam itself.

Supporters of the MB are not the only ones who have a Manichean
worldview. One does not see this kind of sentiment coming from the
leadership of the opposition – but certainly, there are those who view
this as a cultural war. A cultural war where the MB must fall, be
defeated, and emaciated so that Egypt can take her rightful place in the
world. Mr Morsi winning the elections is immaterial – he should never
have been allowed to run in the first place, and it is shameful that
when he did run, all intelligent human beings did not vote for Ahmed
Shafiq, Mubarak’s last prime minister. In the new Egypt, the law must
ban the MB: for otherwise, these fascistic militants will destroy Egypt.

Neither of these perspectives was in the square between the 25th of January and the 11th
of February, 2011. If anything, that kind of worldview back then was
present only in the regime of Hosni Mubarak – and it was precisely that
worldview that the square stood in contradistinction to.

One cannot say that the effects of these two worldviews are equal. A
member of the MB is in the presidency, and it’s organisation all around
Egypt means that the more powerful such a worldview is within, the more
vicious the effects will be on the country as a whole. The sectarian
messaging that is becoming more and more pervasive, describing the
crisis as one where ‘Islam’ itself is under attack, is deeply
concerning. Moreover, such messaging, if it comes from the right people
in positions of authority in the MB, can affect huge numbers of people.

One cannot say the same for the opposition. The political leadership
has far less control over the protestors, who are in the streets not
because al-Baradei or others asked them to – but because they
spontaneously rejected President Morsi’s actions and policies. That
leadership has little control over them. Moreover, the truly concerning
messaging does not come from the leadership anyway – it comes from far
more isolated voices. Qualitatively, the rhetoric is immensely damaging –
but in terms of effect, it’s far more contained.

But where both of these worldviews equally miss the plot is precisely
the dehumanising of the other side. None of which was in the square, and
which is so urgently needed now. The MB need to recall, for example,
that many of those who protest against Mr Morsi today, are the same
people who defended the MB when they were in jails under Mubarak. More
radical supporters of the opposition also need to recognise that while
the MB are their political adversaries, they are an integral part of the
Egyptian political arena, and must be viewed as such.

Diminishing the levels of polarisation is not an easy task – and it
looks as though Egypt will have to engage in years of repair to its
political discourse. But the time for beginning that process must be
forged in a moment of fire, like the one Egypt is undergoing at present.
Egyptians must remember Egypt is big enough for all of them – and that
is why the revolution began on the 25th of January 2011. Anything else is a betrayal of those 18 days.

If the Muslim Brotherhood is convinced it is being targeted for
destruction, then it must seek out alliances with those who, on
principle, will not allow such a thing to happen. Their best hopes for
that are within the opposition. There is one person who holds the key to
beginning that process, not just for this crisis, but for Egypt’s
future. He was elected president of Egypt in June 2012.
 

Dr H.A. Hellyer, non-resident Fellow at the Brookings
Institution and ISPU, previously held senior posts at Gallup and Warwick
University. Follow him on Twitter @hahellyer http://www.hahellyer.com/

This article was published by AhramOnline on December 9, 2012. Read it here. 

Tags: