Pakistan’s Sharif Must Navigate between Wary Military and Assertive Judiciary
When Pakistan’s newly elected prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, appointed his Cabinet, he decided to keep two major portfolios for himself: foreign affairs and defense. The move was widely interpreted as emanating from the civil-military imbalance that defines decision-making on foreign and security policy in Pakistan. Senior members of Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) explained that Sharif wanted to prevent the kind of “misunderstandings” between the prime minister and the military on matters of foreign affairs that had occurred in the past, and added, “We’ve been dominated by the military for decades. And they still think they are superior to the elected politicians. . . . The politicians have to throw their weight around as well.”
Today’s Pakistan features not just a tussle for power between the civilian government and the military, but also an assertive judiciary. These realities put Sharif, who previously served two terms as prime minister in the 1990s, in a tough spot, as in the past he has engaged in power struggles with both institutions. Now, in addition to solving major policy problems, one of Sharif’s major challenges will be navigating his way around a powerful military and activist judiciary…
This article was published by World Politics Review. To continue reading, click here
Shehzad H. Qazi is a Research Associate at ISPU.
ISPU scholars are provided a space on our site to display a selection of op-eds. These were not necessarily commissioned by ISPU, nor is their presence on the site equal to an endorsement of the content. The opinions expressed are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ISPU.