Julie Macfarlane

27-Macfarlane

Julie Macfarlane

Expert

Areas of Expertise: Dispute resolution especially mediation, legal practice and the legal profession, Islamic family law and cultural traditions, Access to justice, Sexual violence against women

Disclaimer: the work linked below reflects the view of the author and does not necessarily reflect the view of ISPU.

Dr. Julie Macfarlane is Distinguished Professor and Professor of Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Windsor. She has received a number of professional honours in the course of her career, including the David Mundell Medal for Legal Writing (2016), the Institute for Social Policy Understanding Scholar of the Year Award (2012) and the International Academy of Mediators Award of Excellence (2005). Her weekly blog on the SRL phenomenon won a 2015 Clawbie for best Canadian Legal Blog for a non-lawyer audience.

Julie has researched and written extensively on dispute resolution and in particular the role of lawyers. Her bestselling 2008 book The New Lawyer: How Settlement is Transforming the Practice of Law (University of British Colombia Press) is based on hundreds of personal interviews with lawyers and their lawyers. It has been the focus of dozens of workshops conducted by Dr Macfarlane in the US, Canada, the UK and Australia and a 2nd edition is forthcoming. Julie was the editor of Dispute Resolution: Readings and Case Studies  (Emond Montgomery) a student text used widely in ADR courses in Canadian and US law schools for the first three editions, and continues as a chapter author in the 2015 4th edition.

In 2011 Julie completed a four-year empirical research project examining the use of Islamic family law principles and values in divorce processes conducted by third parties in North American mosques. Islamic Divorce in North America : Choosing a Shari’a Path in a Secular Society was published by Oxford University Press in April 2012. This work has been featured in numerous media reports on shari’a law. Julie continues to publish and speak in this area (for example, ‘Practicing an “Islamic imagination”: Islamic Divorce in North America’ in Debating Shari’ah Selby J. and Korteweg A. (eds) University of Toronto Press 2012 and  “’Difference’ or ‘sameness’? Law, social ordering and Islamic marriage and divorce in North America” 29(3) Australian Journal of Family Law (2015) 172).

In 2013, Julie completed a major qualitative study of self-represented litigants in family and civil courts in three Canadian provinces (funded by the provincial Law Foundations). The Final Report of the National SRL Research Project is available at https://representingyourselfcanada.com/2014/05/05/research-report). The study methodology has been replicated by the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System at the University of Denver in four US states (report released June 2016). Julie continues to work on the issue of self-representation and the many challenges it presents for both SRLs and those working in the justice system as the Director of the National Self-Represented Litigants Project (www.representingyourselfcanada.com).

Julie is an active mediator, and consults regularly on conflict resolution interventions, training, program evaluation and systems design for a range of public and private sector clients. Over the past 20 years, she has provided conflict intervention training for legal practitioners, law students, civil servants, union and management groups, aboriginal council members, legal aid workers and health care professionals.

Education

Ph.D.

Areas of Expertise

  1. Dispute resolution especially mediation
  2. Legal practice and the legal profession
  3. Islamic family law and cultural traditions
  4. Access to justice
  5. Sexual violence against women

Publications

Strikingly absent from the discourse about Bahrain’s ongoing pro-democracy movement are the non-sectarian grounds upon which the calls for democracy are based. A closer look at the recent demonstrations indicates that the movement’s impetus is the Bahrainis’ desire for universal social, economic, and political rights irrespective of religious sect.
Description Policy-makers and the public are increasingly attentive to the role of shari'a in the everyday lives of Western Muslims, with negative associations and public fears growing among their non-Muslim neighbors in the United States and Canada. The most common way North American Muslims relate to shari'a is in their observance of Muslim marriage and…
It took the United States government nearly 10 years to hunt down and kill Osama bin Laden in retribution for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Over that same period, Muslims struggled to overcome guilt by association for the criminal acts of bin Laden. Meanwhile, all Americans were forced to give up civil liberties in a…
Executive Summary This is the first empirical study to ask North American Muslims what shari’a means to them in their everyday lives. The study demonstrates that the present “moral panic” over shari’a and its alleged impact on American legal and social culture is wildly overblown. For most American Muslims shari’a represents a private system of…
Morsi’s soft approach to security in the Sinai alienated the Egyptian military and provided another reason for them to support the opposition.
With every step toward democracy, mistakes were made that provide important lessons as Egyptians develop the political maturity and experience needed to effectively self-govern, and the current political crisis highlights six particularly important lessons at this critical juncture in Egypt’s history.
If the government is serious about partnering with Muslim communities, it must stop behaving like an adversary.
It is time for Muslim mothers to do for government entrapment what mothers in the 1980s did for drunk driving. Step in and prevent your sons from becoming another statistic.
In the post-9/11 era, Muslim women donning a headscarf in the United States find themselves trapped at the intersection of bias against Islam, the racialized Muslim, and women.
Today’s justice system and the legal profession have rendered the “lawyer-warrior” notion outdated, shifting toward conflict resolution rather than protracted litigation. The new lawyer’s skills go beyond court battles to encompass negotiation, mediation, collaborative practice, and restorative justice. In The New Lawyer, Julie Macfarlane explores the evolving role of practitioners, articulating legal and ethical complexities…
Immediately after 9/11, anti-Muslim prejudice was manifested most prominently as racial profiling, with Muslim men being the primary targets. The failure to effectively combat it has emboldened bigots into more open expressions of hatred directed at those regarded as most vulnerable: women.
But for Egypt to achieve sustainable democracy, many reforms remain to be implemented, the most important of which is public access to information that permits meaningful government accountability.
The divorce rate among North American Muslims has risen sharply in the last 25 years. While marriage breakdown is also on the rise in some Muslim countries, for many members of the older generation divorce was unusual or even unheard of in their family. When marriages did end, the widespread social taboo associated with divorce…
Recently, Florida’s House of Representatives passed a bill (which later died in the state Senate) to ban the use of “foreign law” in domestic courtrooms. Such a bill may seem innocuous but according to the Miami Herald, flyers have circulated in Senate offices describing sharia – Islamic principles which are part of a voluntary system…
Virginia's House of Delegates is set to vote soon on HB825, a bill introduced by Del. Bob Marshall that seeks to restrict Virginia courts from using "foreign law" in any court ruling. The bill's target, of course, is Shariah and has been supported by many of the same characters who helped develop similar legislation in…